Abstract

This paper investigates possible improvements of abstraction to simplify finite-state machines during compositional nonblocking verification of large discrete event systems. Current methods to simplify finite-state machines depend on the absence of transitions from the states to be simplified, and selfloop transitions, i.e., transitions with the same source and target state, are a common culprit that prevents simplification. Some methods to remove such selfloops are known, but they require events that appear on selfloops in the entire finite-state machine to be simplified. The methods described in this paper improve on this, because they allow for the removal of individual selfloop transitions from a finite-state machine while preserving conflict equivalence. This makes it possible to remove more transitions, thus reducing the computational effort of compositional nonblocking verification. Two abstraction rules are proposed, and experimental results show the potential of improvement over previously used methods.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.