Abstract

Public order is defined as the vital interests of the state that affect its entity and without which it affects the functioning of the state. Therefore, public order is the foundation upon which the group is based, whether these foundations are political, economic, social, or moral. The characteristic of ambiguity covers the character of the idea of public order, and this ambiguity makes it difficult for individuals to abide by the limits of public order. The matter may also escape from the control of administrative control without knowing which of these elements are considered among the components of public order. It may lead to the administration’s abuse of its authority by placing restrictions on the freedom of individuals on the pretext of their violation of public order. The ambiguity may be deliberate in part for the authority to use it as a weapon in his hand when authority sees that it does not fit his own interests. Believing that one of the ways to solve and demystify the ambiguity surrounding the public order is to enumerate the elements of the public order, and the problem is not in the traditional aspects because they are obscured. In contrast, the ambiguity remains about the modern aspects of the public order. Therefore, jurisprudence and the judiciary have put forward modern elements of public order in its material part, including the public economic order, the beauty of elegance and arrogance, and the environmental public order, and its moral aspect that embraces public morals and the protection of human dignity and religious public order.

Highlights

  • Public order is defined as the vital interests of the state that affect its entity and without which it affects the functioning of the state

  • Public order is the foundation upon which the group is based, whether these foundations are political, economic, social, or moral

  • The matter may escape from the control of administrative control without knowing which of these elements are considered among the components of public order

Read more

Summary

Introduction

‫(‪ ))47‬نفس المصدر‪ ،‬ص‪.118‬‬ ‫(‪ ))48‬بلخير محمد آيت عويدة ‪ ،‬المصدر السابق‪ ،‬ص‪174‬و مابعدها‪.‬‬ ‫(‪CE, 27 octobre 1995, n° 136727, recueil Lebon, version électronique, publiée ))49‬‬ ‫منشور على الموقع الالكتروني‪www.legifrance.gouv.fr, consulté le 16/03/201 :‬‬ ‫(‪ ))50‬مريم بن عباس‪ ،‬العناصر الحديثة للنظام العام في القانون الاداري‪ ،‬مجلة الباحث للدراسات الاكايمية‪ ،‬الجزائر‪ ،‬العدد‪،1‬‬

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.