Abstract

In a standard post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) process, the regeneration energy of the CO2 lean solvent dominates the overall energy consumption. The energy reduction achieved by stripper modifications, such as the cold-split bypass, interheated stripper, and integration of both configurations, have been reported in the literature. In the cold-split bypass, the cold rich stream is split to recover the energy contained in the overhead vapor that was directly fed into the condenser in the traditional stripper configuration. The interheated stripper draws the semi-rich solvent from the middle of the stripper and exchanges heat with the hightemperature lean solvent from the reboiler; thereby, the overall column temperature can be raised that favors CO2 desorption along the column. Therefore, the literature reported that the integrated modification, combining the cold-split bypass with the interheated stripper, takes both advantages of above modifications that can further reduce the energy requirement. However, the present work shows that energy-saving effect of integrated process is not as promising as the literature claimed. Once the feed stage of the warm-rich solvent is determined properly, the cold-split process can achieve the similar energy-saving performance as that achieved by the integrated process.

Highlights

  • In an aqueous amine-based post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) process, the regeneration energy of the CO2 lean solvent dominates the overall energy consumption

  • The semi-rich solvent was drawn from the tenth plate of the stripper and heated by the IH using the hot lean solvent, and the heated solvent was returned to the eleventh plate

  • The results show that the required energy of cold-split bypass can be further driven to a lower value by implementing an IH; in this case, the extra IH only improved 2.3% of energy reduction that is not as promising as the literature claimed (Le Moullec et al, 2014; Lin et al, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In an aqueous amine-based post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) process, the regeneration energy of the CO2 lean solvent dominates the overall energy consumption. Le Moullec et al (2014) surveyed the process modifications for the energy saving of amine-based PCC technology from the patent databases and open literature, and categorized them into 20 elementary groups They compared the energy reduction for each elementary group and reported that a reduction of 10%–12% in reboiler duty can be achieved by the cold-split bypass, and that the interheated stripper can reduce 13.4% of the energy consumption; according to their survey, the integration of both modifications can save 39% of the energy requirement. The energy-saving effect of the advanced stripper configurations is investigated by the Aspen Plus V10

Simulation Model
Standard Process
Cold-split bypass
Cold Split Fraction
Cold-split bypass and interheated stripper
Summary
CO2 Lean Loading
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.