Abstract

BackgroundSubstance use is a risk factor for intimate partner abuse (IPA) perpetration. Delivering perpetrator interventions concurrently with substance use treatment shows promise.MethodsThe feasibility of conducting an efficacy and cost-effectiveness trial of the ADVANCE 16-week intervention to reduce IPA by men in substance use treatment was explored. A multicentre, parallel group individually randomised controlled feasibility trial and formative evaluation was conducted. Over three temporal cycles, 104 men who had perpetrated IPA towards a female (ex) partner in the past year were randomly allocated to receive the ADVANCE intervention + substance use treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 54) or TAU only (n = 50) and assessed 16-weeks post-randomisation. Participants’ (ex) partners were offered support and 27 provided outcome data. Thirty-one staff and 12 men who attended the intervention participated in focus groups or interviews that were analysed using the framework approach. Pre-specified criteria assessed the feasibility of progression to a definitive trial: 1) ≥ 60% of eligible male participants recruited; 2) intervention acceptable to staff and male participants; 3) ≥ 70% of participants followed-up and 4) levels of substance use and 5) IPA perpetrated by men in the intervention arm did not increase from average baseline level at 16-weeks post-randomisation.Results70.7% (104/147) of eligible men were recruited. The formative evaluation confirmed the intervention’s acceptability. Therapeutic alliance and session satisfaction were rated highly. The overall median rate of intervention session attendance (of 14 compulsory sessions) was 28.6% (range 14.3–64.3% by the third cycle). 49.0% (51/104) of men and 63.0% (17/27) of their (ex) partners were followed-up 16-weeks post-randomisation. This increased to 100% of men and women by cycle three. At follow-up, neither substance use nor IPA perpetration had worsened for men in the intervention arm.ConclusionsIt was feasible to deliver the ADVANCE intervention in substance use treatment services, although it proved difficult to collect data from female (ex)partners. While some progression criteria were met, others were not, although improvements were demonstrated by the third cycle. Lessons learned will be implemented into the study design for a definitive trial of the ADVANCE intervention.Trial registrationISRCTN79435190 prospectively registered 22nd May 2018.

Highlights

  • Substance use is a risk factor for intimate partner abuse (IPA) perpetration

  • Lessons learned will be implemented into the study design for a definitive trial of the ADVANCE intervention

  • The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram in Fig. 1a shows that 2127 men were approached in substance use treatment waiting rooms and treatment and support groups by researchers, only 221 men (10.3% of men approached) were formally assessed for eligibility using the Abusive Behavior Inventory (ABI-R) by the researchers: 147 (66.5%) were eligible and 74 (33.5%) were ineligible

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Substance use is a risk factor for intimate partner abuse (IPA) perpetration. Intimate partner abuse (IPA), most commonly perpetrated by men towards women, refers to behaviour within an intimate relationship that causes harm, including physical, psychological, sexual and controlling behaviours [1]. At least half of substance use treatment seekers have a comorbid mental health disorder [3], potentially contributing to the higher prevalence of IPA perpetration. Unemployment, adverse childhood experiences, substance use, mental health disorders, anger, hostility, poor executive function, low empathy, relationship conflicts, misogynistic attitudes and attitudes that condone violence, and support for gender specific roles are risk factors for IPA perpetration [4,5,6,7]. Intoxication, craving, and withdrawal from substances are rarely the only explanation as IPA perpetration is “primed and entangled with sexual jealousy, with perceptions of female impropriety and with women’s opposition to male authority” ( [11]; pp.1)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call