Advance in bioequivalence assessment of topical dermatological products

Abstract

Bioequivalence (BE) assessment of topical dermatological products is a long standing challenge. The development of generic topical dermatological products has often been hampered due to the limited number of acceptable approaches, which are capable of determining the BE between generic products and reference list products. The aim of this manuscript is to review different BE assessment approaches of topical dermatological products. Besides, the advances in BE evaluation and biowaivers are also provided. Currently, except in the case of dermatological corticosteroids, the golden rule to establish the BE of most topical dermatological products still heavily relied on clinical endpoint trials, which are often unreliable, time-consuming and expensive. The regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical industries are forging ahead to the development of new surrogate BE assessment approaches for other topical dermatological products. These promising approaches include dermatopharmacokinetic study (DPK), dermal microdialysis (DMD), in vitro studies, pharmacokinetic study (PK), near-infrared spectrometry (NIR), and confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS). In addition, the expansion of biowaivers for topical dermatological products has been explored by pharmaceutical scientists. In conclusion, to accelerate the development and approval of topical dermatological products, emphasis should be put on the following areas, i.e., optimizing and standardizing the existing BE assessment methods, exploring novel alternatives of BE assessment approaches, and expanding biowaivers for topical dermatological products.