Adult Neurology Rotations for Child Neurology Residents: Exploring the Resident Perspective

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2014 the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education modified adult training requirements for child neurology certification to reduce the number of hospital-based rotations and require inclusion of outpatient clinic and electives. We aimed to identify how these training requirements are being met and explored its impact on residents. MethodsA REDCap questionnaire surveying resident opinion on impact of adult training on resident education, professional development, and wellness was e-mailed to 79 program directors in the United States for distribution in 2020. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t test calculations. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses involved theme identification. ResultsA total of 116 child neurology residents participated (30.2% PGY-3, 37.9% PGY-4, and 31.9% PGY-5 residents); 20.9% had all adult rotations during the PGY-3 year, and 79.1% had adult rotations spread throughout residency. Adult training had a small positive impact on resident autonomy and a negative impact on resident wellness regardless of training structure. However, residents with 12 months of adult training during PGY-3 year scored worse on burnout, mood changes, work-life balance, and social well-being (P < 0.05). Some themes identified included residents feeling unsafe due to lack of supervision, that education was not prioritized, and that adult patient care lacked relevance to long-term career goals. ConclusionsAdult neurology training was found to negatively affect child neurology resident wellness, with a larger negative impact when adult training was completed in 12 months during PGY-3 year. Other identified areas where change could be implemented include improving feelings of resident safety and prioritizing quality and relevance of education.