Abstract

Observations of CO adsorption on {100} nickel made previously by Park and Farnsworth have been repeated with a combined LEED and mass spectrometer (MS) system. The results confirm the previous observations and are in disagreement with those of Lichtman, Kirst, and McQuistan. Possible causes of the discrepancy are indicated. CO adsorption on the surface subsequent to prolonged heat treatment was greatly reduced due to diffusion of contamination from the bulk. No desorption of O 2 or O was observed even when a CO-covered surface was exposed to O 2 and heated subsequently, but only large desorptions of CO 2 and CO with a c2 × 2-O structure remaining on the surface. Also, heating a surface, which had been exposed to O 2 only, produced desorption of CO but no trace of O 2 or O was found.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.