Abstract
Two eye-tracking experiments were conducted to assess the influence of words either looking like the target word (orthographic distractors) or semantically related to the target word (semantic distractors) on visual search for words within lists by adolescents of 11, 13, and 15 years of age. In Experiment 1 (literal search task), participants saw the target word before the search (e.g., “raven”), whereas in Experiment 2 (categorical task) the target word was only defined by its semantic category (e.g., “bird”). In both experiments, participants’ search times decreased from fifth to ninth grade, both because older adolescents gazed less often at non-target words during the search and because they could reject non-target words more quickly once they were fixated. Progress in visual search efficiency was associated with a large increase in word identification skills, which were a strong determinant of average gaze durations and search times for the categorical task, but much less for the literal task. In the literal task, the presence of orthographic or semantic distractors in the list increased search times for all age groups. In the categorical task, the impact of semantic distractor words was stronger than in the literal task because participants needed to gaze at the semantic distractors longer than at the other words before rejecting them. Altogether, the data support the assumption that the progressive automation of word decoding up until the age of 12 and the better quality of older adolescents’ lexical representations facilitate a flexible use of both the perceptual and semantic features of words for top-down guidance within the displays. In particular, older adolescents were better prepared to aim at or reject words without gazing at them directly. Finally, the overall similar progression of the maturation of single word visual search processes and that of more real-life information search within complex verbal documents suggests that the young adolescents’ difficulties in searching the Web effectively could be due to their insufficiently developed lexical representations and word decoding abilities.
Highlights
In daily life, inquirers of all ages often visually search through verbal displays to locate pieces of information such as the name of objects, places, or people
The impact of orthographic distractors on gaze durations and search times seen in adults was expected to increase with age because it involves a pre-activation of potential target words that is mediated by semantic features, i.e., by automatic spreading activation within the semantic network activated upon seeing the target word category name
The literal search task was easy for all participants, as indicated by the very low error rate
Summary
Inquirers of all ages often visually search through verbal displays (e.g., lists, continuous texts) to locate pieces of information such as the name of objects, places, or people. The impact of orthographic distractors on gaze durations and search times seen in adults was expected to increase with age because it involves a pre-activation of potential target words that is mediated by semantic features, i.e., by automatic spreading activation within the semantic network activated upon seeing the target word category name (see Léger et al, 2012 for more details). In Experiment 1, only a weak relationship was expected between adolescents’ reading proficiency and search times (Leslie and Calfee, 1971; Stanovich et al, 1978), because participants do not need to access the lexical representation of non-target words to reject them. What the data reveal about the development of visual search for words and the practical implications of the data are discussed in the general discussion section
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.