Abstract

Genetic factors are believed to play an important role in the etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Discordant findings for monozygotic (MZ) twins with AIS show that environmental factors including different intrauterine environments are important in etiology, but what these environmental factors may be is unknown. Recent evidence for common chronic non-communicable diseases suggests epigenetic differences may underlie MZ twin discordance, and be the link between environmental factors and phenotypic differences. DNA methylation is one important epigenetic mechanism operating at the interface between genome and environment to regulate phenotypic plasticity with a complex regulation across the genome during the first decade of life. The word exposome refers to the totality of environmental exposures from conception onwards, comprising factors in external and internal environments. The word exposome is used here also in relation to physiologic and etiopathogenetic factors that affect normal spinal growth and may induce the deformity of AIS. In normal postnatal spinal growth we propose a new term and concept, physiologic growth-plate exposome for the normal processes particularly of the internal environments that may have epigenetic effects on growth plates of vertebrae. In AIS, we propose a new term and concept pathophysiologic scoliogenic exposome for the abnormal processes in molecular pathways particularly of the internal environment currently expressed as etiopathogenetic hypotheses; these are suggested to have deforming effects on the growth plates of vertebrae at cell, tissue, structure and/or organ levels that are considered to be epigenetic. New research is required for chromatin modifications including DNA methylation in AIS subjects and vertebral growth plates excised at surgery. In addition, consideration is needed for a possible network approach to etiopathogenesis by constructing AIS diseasomes. These approaches may lead through screening, genetic, epigenetic, biochemical, metabolic phenotypes and pharmacogenomic research to identify susceptible individuals at risk and modulate abnormal molecular pathways of AIS. The potential of epigenetic-based medical therapy for AIS cannot be assessed at present, and must await new research derived from the evaluation of epigenetic concepts of spinal growth in health and deformity. The tenets outlined here for AIS are applicable to other musculoskeletal growth disorders including infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis.

Highlights

  • The principal aim of this paper is to examine the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) from the standpoint of epigenetics

  • Apart from the emerging role of epigenetic mechanisms in the etiology of neural tube defects [60], Prader-Willi syndrome [71,72], and the recent theoretical interpretations of Burwell and colleagues [73,74,75,76] and McMaster [77], epigenetics does not figure in any causal analysis of postnatal normal spinal growth, or in the etiopathogenesis of AIS (Figure 1), This reflects current scientific opinion that genetic rather than environmental factors determine the etiology of AIS in accordance with the genetic variant hypothesis of disease [17,78] (Appendix II)

  • For monozygotic twins and other findings, suggest environmental factors are involved in the etiopathogenesis and phenotypic expression of AIS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The principal aim of this paper is to examine the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) from the standpoint of epigenetics. We propose a new term and concept, pathophysiologic scoliogenic exposome be applied to abnormal processes in normal developmental pathways of the internal environment that have putative epigenetic deforming effects on the growth plates of vertebrae [184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191] at cell, tissue, structure and organ levels, and currently expressed as etiopathogenetic hypotheses (Appendix VII) [192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242] (1) Genetics [2,4,5,92,193,194,195,196,197,198,199]. (2) Biomechanical spinal growth modulation [181,182]. (3) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth (RASO) [200,201,202,203]. (4) Dorsal shear forces and axial rotation instability [204,205]. (5) Asynchronous spinal neuro-osseous growth [206,207,208,209,210,211]. (6) Postural abnormalities including vestibular and CNS dysfunction [2,212,213]. (7) Motor control problem [214,215,216,217]. (8) Body-spatial orientation concept [218]. (9) Neurodevelopmental concept [219]. (10) Thoracospinal concept [79,80,81,82,83,220,221]. (11) Deforming three joint complex hypothesis [222]. (12) Systemic melatonin deficiency [223,224,225,226]. (13) Systemic melatonin-signaling pathway dysfunction [173,174,177,227,228,229,230]. (14) Relative osteopenia [113,114,231,232]. (15) Systemic platelet calmodulin dysfunction [233,234,235,236]. (16) Developmental instability & symmetry control dysfunction [85,86,87,237,238,239,240,241]. (17) Intrinsic growth plate asymmetry hypothesis [74,75,188,237,238,239,240,241]. (18) Collective and escalator models [192]. (19) Leptin-hypothalamic-sympathetic nervous system (LHS) dysfunction with disharmony between somatic and autonomic nervous systems in the spine and trunk [[6], see [3,242]]

18. Feinberg AP
35. Bogin B
Findings
46. Hamilton JP
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.