Abstract

ObjectivesCompare and assess relationships between strength and running biomechanics among healthy adolescents and young adult males and females. DesignRetrospective cohort. SettingClinic. Participants802 healthy participants (570 F, 232 M; 16.6 ± 2.3 years). Main outcome measuresMass-normalized knee flexor and extensor strength, hip adductor and abductor strength, hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q), and abductor-to-adductor (Abd:Add) ratios were obtained using hand-held dynamometry. Mass-normalized peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), %stance, cadence, and stride length were obtained using an instrumented treadmill. Multivariate analyses of variance were used to compare strength and biomechanics across ages and sexes. Linear regressions were used to assess the relationships between strength and biomechanics, accounting for speed, age, and sex. Independent t-tests were used to compare strength between strength ratio profiles. ResultsStrength and running biomechanics significantly differed between sexes (p-range: <0.001–0.05) and age groups (p-range: <0.001–0.02). Strength and strength ratios were significantly associated with increased cadence (p-range:0.001–0.04) and stride lengths (p-range:0.004–0.03), and decreased vGRF (p < 0.001). Lower H:Q ratios had significantly lower strength measures (p < 0.001). Higher Abd:Add ratios had significantly increased abductor strength (p < 0.001). ConclusionsStrength and running biomechanics differed by sexes and ages. Hip and knee strength and strength ratios were related to select spatiotemporal and kinetic biomechanical features.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call