Abstract
A CENTRAL QUESTION in the theory of regulation is what constitutes a fair return on a utility's assets. The current legal answer is that provided by the Supreme Court in its Hope Natural Gas decision. A fair return should be commensurate with returns on investment in other enterprises having corresponding risk (the comparable return standard) and sufficient to attract capitall (the capital attraction standard). Unfortunately, in practice these guidelines are ambiguous and, as a result, are not uniformly applied. In one sense, they are definitional. There is an emerging consensus that a fair percentage rate of return should equal a utility's market determined cost of capital.2 However, the Hope Decision did not specify how the value of a utility's assets, to which the fair percentage return could be applied, was to be calculated. This paper
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
