Abstract

Numerous publications have now addressed the principles of designing, analyzing, and reporting the results of stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials. In contrast, there is little research available pertaining to the design and analysis of multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials, utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple experimental interventions. In this paper, we address this by explaining how the required sample size in these multiarm trials can be ascertained when data are to be analyzed using a linear mixed model. We then go on to describe how the design of such trials can be optimized to balance between minimizing the cost of the trial and minimizing some function of the covariance matrix of the treatment effect estimates. Using a recently commenced trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of sensor monitoring in an occupational therapy rehabilitation program for older persons after hip fracture as an example, we demonstrate that our designs could reduce the number of observations required for a fixed power level by up to 58%. Consequently, when logistical constraints permit the utilization of any one of a range of possible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs, researchers should consider employing our approach to optimize their trials efficiency.

Highlights

  • In a cluster randomized trial (CRT), groups of participants, not individuals, are randomized

  • It was previously demonstrated that the efficiency of a conventional SW-CRT, analyzed with the above linear mixed model, could be assessed using the cluster mean correlation, given by[19]

  • We have presented a method to determine admissible multiarm SW-CRTs (MA-SWs) designs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a cluster randomized trial (CRT), groups of participants, not individuals, are randomized. The advantages this can bring are today recognized as numerous. CRTs can aid the control of contamination between participants and can bring increased administrative efficiency, helping to overcome the barriers of recruiting large numbers of participants.[1] there are several well-noted disadvantages to CRTs.[2,3] double blinding should ideally be present in every trial; it is often impossible in CRTs. missing data can quickly become a problem if whole clusters are lost to follow-up

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.