Abstract

In the Soviet theory, the complex and confusing path that administrative justice overcame in its formation is conditionally divided into four stages. Based on the periodization identified by Soviet scientists (A.V. Absalyamov, V. I. Piunova, and D. M. Chechot) the authors conclude that the institute under consideration was more or less developed in 1961-1993. The administrative justice of the second half of the 20th century has a relatively high quality characteristic, because, first, at the fourth stage of the Soviet period, the right to judicial appeal was assigned to a wider range of persons and was provided for in the most important spheres of society. Second, with the adoption in 1961 of The Foundations of the civil procedure in the USSR and Union republics disputes between the bodies of Soviet power and citizens were separated from other cases and formed a separate category. These two circumstances determined the choice of the research topic.The authors analyze the normative legal acts adopted in the post-war years, which regulated public-legal relations. Familiarization with the theory of the Soviet administrative justice and the practice of its application in the second half of the 20th century is of interest to the former Union Republic, namely the Kazakh SSR. The paper describes the Soviet way of development and improvement of the institute of administrative justice in the period from the end of the Great Patriotic War to the beginning of the collapse of the Soviet Union. The purpose of the work is to study the public legal relations that arose between Soviet citizens and the Soviet state in the person of its bodies and institutions, as well as officials and employees.

Highlights

  • In the Soviet theory, the complex and confusing path that administrative justice overcame in its formation is conditionally divided into four stages

  • The administrative justice of the second half of the 20th century has a relatively high quality characteristic, because, first, at the fourth stage of the Soviet period, the right to judicial appeal was assigned to a wider range of persons and was provided for in the most important spheres of society

  • With the adoption in 1961 of The Foundations of the civil procedure in the USSR and Union republics disputes between the bodies of Soviet power and citizens were separated from other cases and formed a separate category

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ввиду того, что в отношении административно-правовых споров не был установлен отдельный порядок их рассмотрения и разрешения, дела, входящие в указанную категорию, рассматривались и разрешались по правилам гражданского судопроизводства. Н. Старилова, отметившего, что в рассматриваемый период дискуссии возникали в основном по вопросу гражданско-процессуальной или административно-процессуальной природы рассмотрения и разрешения судом дел об обжаловании или оспаривании решений, актов, действий, бездействия органов государственной власти, должностных лиц, государственных служащих[11]. Возникающих из административных или публичных правоотношений, подлежащих рассмотрению и разрешению судами, был исчерпывающим, граждане, а тем более организации, были ограничены в судебной защите своих прав.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call