Abstract
The Utrecht Law Review is an open-access peer-reviewed journal which aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research. In the first place, this concerns research in which the boundaries of the classic branches of the law (private law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, European and public international law) are crossed and connections are made between these areas of the law, amongst others from a comparative law perspective. In addition, the journal welcomes research in which classic law is brought face to face with not strictly legal disciplines such as philosophy, economics, political sciences and public administration science.The journal was established in 2005 and is affiliated to the Utrecht University School of Law. If you wish to receive e-mail alerts please join the mailing list.
Highlights
Citizens participating in proceedings typically assume that a judgment will bring them certainty with regard to their legal position
The first research question of this study aims to elucidate how the Council of State can ascertain, by means of its judgment, that the administrative authority takes a new decision that remains unchallenged in court
A significant relationship was found between the number of claimants and the course of a dispute after a new decision is taken
Summary
Citizens participating in proceedings typically assume that a judgment will bring them certainty with regard to their legal position This is generally the case in proceedings in private law and criminal law. Judgments offer an insight into aspects of a dispute such as the nature of the decision, the type of administrative authority involved, the number of parties involved (i.e. a conflict between two or three parties) and the number of claimants. To get a grip on these factors, it was necessary to clarify the decision-making process of administrative authorities To this end, data was gathered in two ways: 21 Of the 125 cases, 73 involved three or more parties to the conflict, while 52 involved only two parties. For each of the 125 cases in the sample, data was collected on the amount of time the administrative authority used to reach a new decision.[22]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
