Abstract

This review describes the progress that the concept of adjuvant therapies has undergone in the last 50 years and focuses on the most recent development where an adjuvant approach has been scientifically evaluated in melanoma clinical trials. Over the past decade the development of immunotherapies and targeted therapies has drastically changed the treatment of stage IV melanoma patients. These successes led to trials studying the same therapies in the adjuvant setting, in high risk resected stage III and IV melanoma patients. Adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade with anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab was the first drug to show an improvement in recurrence-free and overall survival but this was accompanied by high severe toxicity rates. Therefore, these results were bypassed by adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab and BRAF-directed target therapy, which showed even better recurrence-free survival rates with more favorable toxicity rates. The whole concept of adjuvant therapy may be integrated with the new neoadjuvant approaches that are under investigation through several clinical trials. However, there is still no data available on whether the effective adjuvant therapy that patients finally have at their disposal could be offered to them while waiting for recurrence, sparing at least 50% of them a potentially long-term toxic side effect but with the same rate of overall survival (OS). Adjuvant therapy for melanoma has radically changed over the past few years—anti-PD-1 or BRAF-directed therapy is the new standard of care.

Highlights

  • Melanoma was not broadly treated worldwide with adjuvant therapy

  • Murali et al [27] did a study that tested the interobserver variability of the different ways to assess SN-tumor burden (Rotterdam criteria, Starz classification, microanatomic location, etc.) and demonstrated that the diameter of the largest lesion was the most reproducible, but the clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases (

  • Adjuvant IFN should be reserved only for patients with ulcerated melanomas and no metastases or small metastases in the SN in those countries where there is no reimbursement for the newer adjuvant therapies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Melanoma was not broadly treated worldwide with adjuvant therapy. This was largely due to the absence of effective systemic therapy options. Since the impact of significant changes in the classification represent an important aspect to be considered; from the AJCC 7th to the 8th edition, the subdivision of four categories of risk of stage III may have caused some confusion in the selection of the correct patient population to be proposed for an adjuvant treatment, since most of the trials which have resulted in the success of the new therapies were AJCC-7th-edition-based. Murali et al [27] did a study that tested the interobserver variability of the different ways to assess SN-tumor burden (Rotterdam criteria, Starz classification, microanatomic location, etc.) and demonstrated that the diameter of the largest lesion was the most reproducible, but the clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases (

The Past
Interferon
Vaccines
Anti-Angiogenic
Neo Adjuvant Studies
The Future
Findings
10. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call