Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy plus whole pelvic radiation therapy (RT) on recurrence rates, patterns of recurrence, and survival of patients post-RH-PLND for cervical cancer at high risk for recurrence. Methods: Prospective multicenter randomized Phase III trial. Patients with Stage IB–IIA cervical cancer undergoing RH-PLND were eligible. Risk factors include deep cervical invasion, tumor ≥4 cm, parametrial involvement, nonsquamous histology, and/or pelvic lymph node metastasis. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin and bleomycin, alone or in combination with whole pelvic RT. Survival was determined by Kaplan–Meier estimate. Results: Eighty-nine patients were entered from 1987 to 1994. Seventy-five patients had a Stage IB cancer and 14 patients had Stage IIA. Twenty-five patients had ≥3 risk factors. Forty-four patients received chemotherapy alone vs 45 patients treated with chemotherapy and RT. Nineteen patients had recurrences and 16 patients have died. Nine of 44 (20%) patients receiving chemo alone recurred compared to 10/45 (22%) patients receiving chemo and RT (P= ns). Patterns of recurrence were statistically similar between the two treatment arms, even among the subgroup of patients with ≥3 risk factors. Both regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion: CT + RT did not prove a superior adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk of recurrence after RH-PLND for early cervical cancer in this limited trial. Recurrence rates and patterns of recurrences (local, regional, or distant) were not influenced by the addition of RT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.