Abstract
BackgroundTo continuously improve medical quality and provide clinicians with more accurate blood test reports, this study collected blood quality control data in 2017 from a medical examination laboratory in a teaching level hospital located in Taoyuan City, Taiwan.Material and MethodsThe quality control data were arranged and analyzed from daily complete blood count (CBC), including white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), and platelets (PLT) recorded by a laboratory blood analyzer. Using the empirical Bayesian method, we estimated the variation of concentrations of the last and current batches to establish a novel control chart with adjusted upper and lower limits for the current batch, and then compared results with the traditional Shewhart method. The average run length (ARL) and sensitivity of the empirical Bayesian method were explored.ResultsThe study found that ARL showed a qualified capability for the four blood routine tests when using the empirical Bayesian method. Compared to the Levey–Jennings control chart, the novel control chart presents an alert earlier when a deviation occurs and shows a fake alert later when there is no deviation.ConclusionThe parallel tests showed that the longer the time is, the better the test’s proficiency. We concluded that the empirical Bayesian method could be applied effectively to improve the capability of daily control in CBC laboratory tests.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.