Abstract

AbstractTo avoid the most dangerous consequences of anthropogenic climate change, the Paris Agreement provides a clear and agreed climate mitigation target of stabilizing global surface warming to under 2.0°C above preindustrial, and preferably closer to 1.5°C. However, policy makers do not currently know exactly what carbon emissions pathways to follow to stabilize warming below these agreed targets, because there is large uncertainty in future temperature rise for any given pathway. This large uncertainty makes it difficult for a cautious policy maker to avoid either: (1) allowing warming to exceed the agreed target or (2) cutting global emissions more than is required to satisfy the agreed target, and their associated societal costs. This study presents a novel Adjusting Mitigation Pathway (AMP) approach to restrict future warming to policy‐driven targets, in which future emissions reductions are not fully determined now but respond to future surface warming each decade in a self‐adjusting manner. A large ensemble of Earth system model simulations, constrained by geological and historical observations of past climate change, demonstrates our self‐adjusting mitigation approach for a range of climate stabilization targets ranging from 1.5°C to 4.5°C, and generates AMP scenarios up to year 2300 for surface warming, carbon emissions, atmospheric CO2, global mean sea level, and surface ocean acidification. We find that lower 21st century warming targets will significantly reduce ocean acidification this century, and will avoid up to 4 m of sea‐level rise by year 2300 relative to a high‐end scenario.

Highlights

  • There is uncertainty in the response of the climate system to any given future scenario, shown by the wide warming responses of climate models (IPCC, 2013) when forced with the same prescribed forcing pathways (Meinshausen et al, 2011)

  • While warming appears to be linearly related to cumulative carbon emissions, there is currently significant uncertainty in the sensitivity of this linear relationship (e.g., Allen et al, 2009; Gillet et al, 2013; Goodwin et al, 2015; IPCC, 2013; Matthews et al, 2009)

  • This study has presented Adjusting Mitigation Pathway (AMP) scenarios, in which the carbon emission pathway is reassessed every decade, starting at year 2030 after the Paris Agreement Intended Nationally Determined Contributions” (INDC) period (UNFCCC, 2015), to steer the global surface temperature anomaly to the agreed policy target

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is uncertainty in the response of the climate system to any given future scenario, shown by the wide warming responses of climate models (IPCC, 2013) when forced with the same prescribed forcing pathways (Meinshausen et al, 2011). An efficient Earth system model is used to test this adjusting approach to mitigation for climate stabilization targets between 1.5∘C and 4.5∘C above preindustrial, and generate scenarios for warming, atmospheric CO2, surface ocean pH and global mean sea-level (GMSL) rise for the different climate stabilization targets. The full AMP scenarios for emissions, warming, atmospheric CO2, surface ocean acidification, and sea-level rise defined and described here are given in Supporting Information S1

Methods
Reference warming
AMP Scenarios to Year 2300
AMP Scenario Warming Trajectories to Year 2300
AMP Scenario Emissions Trajectories to Year 2300
Impact on Robustness of Interannual Temperature Variability
Findings
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call