Abstract
Computer navigation increases accuracy and precision of component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to the manual technique, but is often associated with increases in surgical time. In a previous cadaver study, we demonstrated a significant improvement in guide positioning precision, final bone cut precision, and procedure length when using adjustable cutting blocks (ACB) compared to conventional cutting blocks (CCB) in computer-navigated TKA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ACB in vivo. We radiographically compared component alignment and mechanical leg alignment, as well as tourniquet time, in 94 patients who underwent TKA using either ACB (N = 30) or CCB (N = 64). Postoperative mechanical alignment variability was significantly less in the ACB group (SD = 1.7°) than in the CCB group (SD = 2.7°). Tourniquet time was significantly reduced by 14.8 min in the ACB group compared to the CCB. Differences in component alignment were not significant. ACB for TKA significantly reduced postoperative mechanical alignment variability and tourniquet time compared to conventional navigated instrumentation, while providing equal or better component alignment. III.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
