Abstract

The paper is devoted to an adjoint complement to the universal Law of the Wall (LoW) for fluid dynamic momentum boundary layers. The latter typically follows from a strongly simplified, unidirectional shear flow under a constant stress assumption. We first derive the adjoint companion of the simplified momentum equation, while distinguishing between two strategies. Using mixing-length arguments, we demonstrate that the frozen turbulence strategy and a LoW-consistent (differentiated) approach provide virtually the same adjoint momentum equations, that differ only in a single scalar coefficient controlling the inclination in the logarithmic region. Moreover, it is seen that an adjoint LoW can be derived which resembles its primal counterpart in many aspects. The strategy is also compatible with wall-function assumptions for prominent RANS-type two-equation turbulence models, which ground on the mixing-length hypothesis. As a direct consequence of the frequently employed assumption that all primal flow properties algebraically scale with the friction velocity, it is demonstrated that a simple algebraic expression provides a consistent closure of the adjoint momentum equation in the logarithmic layer. This algebraic adjoint closure might also serve as an approximation for more general adjoint flow optimization studies using standard one- or two-equation Boussinesq-viscosity models for the primal flow. Results obtained from the suggested algebraic closure are verified against the primal/adjoint LoW formulations for both, low- and high-Re settings. Applications included in this paper refer to two- and three-dimensional shape optimizations of internal and external engineering flows. Related results indicate that the proposed adjoint algebraic turbulence closure accelerates the optimization process and provides improved optima at no computational surplus in comparison to the frozen turbulence approach.

Highlights

  • This paper is concerned with the formulation of an adjoint Law of the Wall (LoW) serving the formulation of momentum boundary conditions in an adjoint analysis and a related algebraic treatment of turbulence in the adjoint framework

  • Modelling equations for the turbulent closure appear comparatively complex already on the primal side. The latter is underlined by an unfavourable algorithmic complexity that contains possibly non-differentiable expressions making it unhandy for a continuous adjoint approach which has motivated the neglect of adjoint turbulence models in line with the frozen turbulence approach (Soto et al 2004; Othmer 2008; Dwight and Brézillon 2006)

  • The adjoint LoW essentially resembles the primal LoW, and the differences refer to a simple scaling with the ratio between the primal and the adjoint friction velocity and the inclination in the logarithmic region, which reduces for the LoW-consistent approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper is concerned with the formulation of an adjoint Law of the Wall (LoW) serving the formulation of momentum boundary conditions in an adjoint analysis and a related algebraic treatment of turbulence in the adjoint framework. We believe that there is a fundamental interest into an analytical formulation for a continuous adjoint complement to the momentum law of the wall, since the concept is (and perhaps will be) intensively employed by turbulent flow simulations using wall functions To this extent, the paper distinguishes between two adjoint turbulence formulations, i.e. an algebraic, mixing-length based approach and a simple frozen turbulence approach. The analysis suggests a surprisingly simple algebraic approximation for an adjoint turbulence treatment Results obtained by this strategy are deemed consistent to LoW physics and indicate improvements over the frozen turbulence assumption when applied to more general flows without solving an adjoint turbulence transport model. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Sections 2 and 3 are concerned with the derivation of the adjoint unidirectional shear flow equations for a frozen as well as a consistently linearized turbulent viscosity contribution. Einstein’s summation convention is used for lower-case Latin subscripts and vectors as well as tensors are defined with reference to Cartesian coordinates

Primal Unidirectional Shear Flow
Adjoint Unidirectional Shear Flow
Law of the Wall
Adjoint Two‐Equation Wall Functions
Verifications
Applications
D U x2 x1 D
Conclusions
Findings
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call