Adipose Tissue Distribution and Body Mass Index (BMI) Correlation With Daily Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) Shifts of Abdominal Radiation Therapy Patients.

Abstract

Purpose There are several studies suggesting a correlation between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) setup errors and body mass index (BMI). However, abdominal fat content has visceral and subcutaneous components, which may affect setup errors differently. This study aims to analyze a potential workflow for characterizing adipose content and distribution in the region of the target that would allow a quickly calculated metric of abdominal fat content to stratify these patients. Methods IGRT shift data was retrospectively tabulated from daily fan-beam CT-on-rails pre-treatment alignment for 50 abdominal radiation therapy (RT) patients, and systematic and random errors in the daily setup were characterized by tabulating average and standard deviations of shift data for each patient and looking at differences for different distributions of adipose content. Visceral and subcutaneous fat content were defined by visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) using a region-growing algorithm to contour adipose tissue on CT simulation scans. All contours were created for a single slice at the treatment isocenter, on which the VFA and SFA were calculated. A log-rank test was used to test trends in shifts over quartiles of adiposity. Results VFA ranged from 1.9-342.8c m2, and SFA from 11.8-756.0 cm2. The standard definition (SD) of random error (σ) in the lateral axis for Q1 vs. Q4 VFA was 0.10cm vs. 0.29cm, 0.12cm vs. 0.28cm for SFA, and 0.12cm vs. 0.31cm for BMI. The percentage of longitudinal shifts greater than 10mm for Q1 vs. Q4 VFA was 0% vs. 9%, 2% vs. 19% for SFA, and 0% vs. 20% for BMI. Statistically significant trends in shifts vs. the BMI quartile were seen for both pitch and the longitudinal direction, as well as for pitch corrections vs. the VFA quartile. Conclusion Within this dataset, abdominal cancer patients showed statistically significant trends in shift probability vs. BMI and VFA. Also, patients in the upper quartiles of all adiposity metrics showed an increased SD of σ in the lateral direction and increased shifts over 10 mm in the longitudinal direction. However, despite these relationships, neither VFA nor SFA offered discernible advantages in their relationship to shift uncertainty relative to BMI.