Adhesive fracture of a lap shear joint

Abstract

In many respects, adhesive and cohesive fractures are similar. It has been demonstrated in both cases that a Griffith-type energy balance can often be used to predict failure, e.g., crack growth. The only essential difference involves the interpretation of the energy required to create new (adhesive or cohesive) surface area. In the cohesive case, the specific fracture energy γ c is that required to create a new surface in the same material, while in the adhesive case, the specific fracture energy γ a is the energy per unit area required to separate different materials. The mechanical analysis, including a stress analysis to determine the strain energy and energy balance in principle remains unchanged. Generally speaking adhesive-bonded joints involve sharp corners or other “singularities” between adjacent materials which act as stress concentrators, particularly if a crack or other sharp imperfection is present or arises at such a location. The Griffith energy approach circumvents the problem of just how large this mathematically infinite stress must be to initiate failure. Recently, this method had been successfully applied to a number of different adhesive geometries; this paper discusses the case of a single-lap shear joint. This geometry is important because the lap-joint test is a common method for comparing adhesive strengths; in addition, the configuration itself is often used in engineering practice. Adhesive fracture is, therefore, compared on the basis of both energy and maximum stress criteria. Experimental data suggest the former to yield more accurate predictions.