Abstract
Waterfall-climbing gobiids from oceanic islands use a suction-based adhesive mechanism formed by fused pelvic fins (pelvic sucker) and exhibit rock-climbing behavior during upstream migration. Although adhesion is a common feature of locomotion in these fishes, two distinct climbing styles – powerburst climbing and inching – have evolved. We compared the performance of the pelvic sucker during climbing across a range of body sizes between two species that use these different styles, collecting new data from the powerburst climber Lentipes concolor, and comparing these to published data for the inching climber Sicyopterus japonicus. Suction force for adhesion generated during continuous climbing did not differ between the species, with similar mean safety factors of 2.5–3.0. However, L. concolor engaged its pelvic sucker for a significantly longer duration of time (approximately 34 % longer per climbing cycle) than S. japonicus during continuous climbing. During sustained adhesion, both species exhibited non-linear scaling of fatigue time, with intermediate-sized individuals (e.g., large juveniles to small adults) showing the greatest endurance. However, the two species exhibited strikingly different maxima and variability in the endurance of their pelvic suckers. Maximum time to fatigue in L. concolor was less than half that of S. japonicus, but L. concolor showed more than double the variability of S. japonicus in time to fatigue. Our comparisons of these species reveal that despite differences in several aspects of their adhesive performance, some features of sucker function remain similar across climbing styles, including several related to how performance changes through ontogeny.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.