Abstract
Migration, a multifaceted phenomenon, has a significant impact on health. Migrants perform similar movement patterns within their country of origin, in transit, and in the country of destination, thus making it difficult to monitor TB treatment throughout the journey. The objective was to compare the effectiveness of different treatment modalities in adherence to the short-term regimen for LTBI (3HP) among international migrants and refugees. This is a quasi-experimental study conducted in Manaus-AM. The study population was made up of international migrants. The certification and monitoring of medication intake employed three strategies: self-administration (SA), directly observed conventional therapy (DOT), and Video Telemonitoring System for Tuberculosis Treatment (VDOT). The VDOT group and SA group exhibited the lowest rate of treatment dropout or interruption at 16.1%, followed by the DOT group at 23.1%. The results suggest that the most effective strategy for ensuring adherence among migrants and refugees was VDOT (OR_adj 0.26; CI 0.7-0.94), suggesting that migrants may be more likely to adhere to and complete their treatment. The results show that relying on different treatment strategies, adapted to the individuals' needs and risk factors, is a viable and effective way of providing person-centered TB care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.