Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To examine the use of cesarean delivery over time for labor arrest and failed induction and identify predictors of meeting criteria for these indications. METHODS: We analyzed rates of primary cesareans due to arrest of dilation, arrest of descent and failed induction among live births at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2010 through 2013. Criteria for labor arrest and failed induction were based on 2012 guidelines, and the proportions of deliveries meeting these criteria were calculated annually. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess cesarean delivery over time and identify predictors of meeting criteria. IRB approval was obtained. RESULTS: The total primary cesarean delivery rate decreased from 23.5% to 21.1% (<.03). The rate of primary cesarean delivery for arrest of dilation decreased from 5.1% to 3.4% (P<.0005), while the rate of meeting criteria for this indication increased from 18.8% to 34.9% (P<.003). Primary cesarean delivery for arrest of descent and failed induction remained stable; the percent of cases meeting criteria for arrest of descent increased from 57.8% to 71.0% (P<.007). Increased cervical dilation on admission increased the likelihood of meeting criteria for arrest of dilation and descent, and epidural use decreased the likelihood of meeting criteria for arrest of descent. As of 2013, 65.1% of primary cesareans for arrest of dilation, 29.0% for arrest of descent, and 50.0% for failed induction did not meet criteria. CONCLUSION: A decrease in the primary cesarean rate was associated with meeting new criteria for labor arrest. Increased adherence to these criteria could further reduce the cesarean rate.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.