Adherence to national quality guidelines for nodal staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma.

Abstract

110 Background: Assessment of compliance with national quality guidelines for the management of melanoma may be complicated by controversy about selection of patients for nodal surgery and limited by a lack of data on quality metrics. Previous reports suggest suboptimal overall compliance, with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) not performed for many suitable patients and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) omitted in many biopsy-proven node-positive (LN+) cases. The purpose of this study was to assess compliance with national ASCO/SSO guidelines for lymph node (LN) surgery for T2 and T3 (intermediate thickness, 1.01-4.00 mm) primary cutaneous melanoma patients and elucidate factors associated with non-compliance. Methods: All cases of T2 and T3, M0 melanoma were identified from 2004-2010 SEER data. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors of compliance. Five-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Overall, 75.3% (6,609/8,782) of T2-T3 primary cutaneous melanoma patients underwent LN staging including SLNB in 6,330 (74.5%) of 8,492 clinically LN negative patients. Among these 6,609 patients, 1,279 (19.4%) had one or more LN+. 940 LN+ patients (73.4%) underwent CLND with removal of a mean (median, IQR) of 20.7 (18, 11-27) LNs. Compliance with LN staging and management guidelines was associated with truncal primary site (for SLNB), p<0.001 and with patient age <65 yrs and increasing number of metastatic LNs (for CLND), both p<0.0001. Compliance with CLND for LN+ patients was associated with improved 5 year CSS: 70.0% vs 64.6%, p<0.001. Conclusions: Compliance with guidelines for LN surgery in T2 and T3 melanoma is poor despite the well-defined benefit for this group of patients. These data suggest that non-compliance is multifactorial and not simply due to practice differences arising from the controversial aspects of melanoma management. Room for improvement exists. Assessment of modifiable factors associated with poor compliance, design of strategies to improve compliance and the development of performance measures around appropriate LN staging and management of T2 and T3 melanoma deserve further investigation.