Adherence to head and neck cancer guidelines: Multidisciplinary conference recommendations and care delivered.

Abstract

202 Background: Adherence to clinical guidelines, such as those developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), can serve as a quality measure for delivered care. We aimed to determine NCCN guideline compliance of and concordance between multidisciplinary conference (MC) treatment recommendations and treatment received. Methods: A retrospective review of 71 consecutive previously untreated patients from 1/1 to 4/1/2006 evaluated whether MC recommendations were compliant with 2006 NCCN treatment guidelines, what treatment was actually provided, and whether this treatment was congruent with MC recommendations and/or adhered to 2006 NCCN guidelines. Results: TNM staging was documented in 94.4% of MC notes and treatment recommendations were documented for 98.6% of patients. Of enrolled patients, 53% had oropharyngeal cancer, 22.7% had oral cavity cancer, 18.2% had laryngeal cancer, and 6.1% had nasopharyngeal cancer. The mean age at presentation was 57.4 years. Forty-eight patients (72.7%) were men. MC recommendations were not compliant with NCCN guidelines in 7 (10.6%) patients. Reasons for non-compliance were recommended definitive radiation alone for T1/2N2 oropharyngeal cancer (3 patients), recommended over-use of induction chemotherapy (2 patients) or adjuvant therapy (1 patient), and incomplete documentation (1 patient). Actual treatment deviated from MC recommendations in 25 (38.5%) patients, although in 14 of these patients, treatment remained guideline-adherent. Actual treatment was not compliant with guidelines in 9 patients; 4 of these patients had treatment congruent with MC recommendations, which were not NCCN guideline-compliant. Reasons for guideline-discordance in the remaining patients were individual. Conclusions: Discordance with NCCN guidelines for head and neck cancer treatment planning and delivery was observed in this cohort; while some deviations were due to incomplete documentation, areas for improvement were identified. Further study is warranted to determine whether treatment deviating from NCCN guidelines impacts patient outcome.