Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with later depression and there is considerable genetic overlap between them. This study investigated if ADHD and ADHD genetic liability are causally related to depression using two different methods. First, a longitudinal population cohort design was used to assess the association between childhood ADHD (age 7 years) and recurrent depression in young-adulthood (age 18-25 years) in N = 8310 individuals in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Second, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses examined relationships between genetic liability for ADHD and depression utilising published Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data. Childhood ADHD was associated with an increased risk of recurrent depression in young-adulthood (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.73). MR analyses suggested a causal effect of ADHD genetic liability on major depression (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.31). MR findings using a broader definition of depression differed, showing a weak influence on depression (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13). Our findings suggest that ADHD increases the risk of depression later in life and are consistent with a causal effect of ADHD genetic liability on subsequent major depression. However, findings were different for more broadly defined depression.

Highlights

  • Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with later depression and there is considerable genetic overlap between them

  • Longitudinal analyses: association between childhood ADHD and adult depression. Of those included in our sample, 6.4% (N = 530) scored above the ADHD cut-point in childhood and 26.9% had recurrent depression in young-adulthood

  • ADHD in childhood was associated with an increased risk of having recurrent depression in young-adulthood: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.73, p = 0.02

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with later depression and there is considerable genetic overlap between them. Sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of missing ADHD data using MI for the full ALSPAC sample (i.e. including those without age 7 ADHD data) and using IPW found a similar pattern of results with much wider confidence intervals when using IPW (see online Supplementary Material).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call