Abstract

The paper presents the current policy needs and gaps identified in the European Union (EU) Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories to implement Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services (MAES) methodology. Then, a selection of the most appropriate tools and methods for mapping and assessing ecosystem services (biophysical, economic, socio-cultural – and decision-support) is provided to address local needs. Using a performance matrix to assess the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of these tools, key factors required to facilitate the implementation of an ecosystem services framework are identified by considering local needs and possibilities in terms of data availability, mapping support, ecosystem services assessment and decision-support. Our results show how effective and accurate various methods (e.g. process-based models, integrated modelling and most Decision-Supporting Tools) can be, or how efficient other methods are (e.g. value transfer, spatial proxy methods and replacement cost) in data-scarce regions. Participatory approaches score well in terms of sustainability as they allow the assessment of multiple ecosystem services (covering the biophysical, economic and social-cultural components of the assessment) with local stakeholders' contribution, therefore contributing to the awareness-raising dimension. There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, there is a need for flexible, guidance-based ecosystem services mapping and assessment approaches in the EU Overseas entities to facilitate MAES implementation and to adapt and integrate those methods into scenario analysis and decision-supporting tools for better uptake of MAES outputs at the decision-making and policy levels in the EU Overseas entities.

Highlights

  • The concept of ‘natural capital’ started to develop in the 1970s (Westman 1977) due to ecological concerns resulting from natural resources uses, degradation and loss

  • From the list of methods described in the MAES methods Explorer tools, we have reviewed the ones that have been the most used for ecosystem services’ (ES) valuation in Outermost Regions (ORs) and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) according to the extensive literature review made in the project MOVE (Sieber et al 2018, Sieber et al 2020)

  • We considered that the strength and weaknesses identified for each method in previous works remained valid for European Union (EU) Overseas entities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of ‘natural capital’ started to develop in the 1970s (Westman 1977) due to ecological concerns resulting from natural resources uses, degradation and loss. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment launch in 2001 and the release of the synthesis report in 2005 (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005) constituted another milestone that firmly placed the ES concept on the global scale policy agenda The work of this group, initiated by the United Nations, made it possible to define a first “official” nomenclature of ES, taken up and subsequently refined by The Economics of Environment and Biodiversity (TEEB). As the concept of ES became more and more accepted and integrated amongst researchers (Egoh et al 2008) for its ability to bridge natural sciences with society and policy (Drius et al 2019) and, as a result, for its added value in spatial planning and management, the number of tools and approaches to assess the same service increased substantially. Information and data have been collected during the lifespan of the EU project MOVE - Facilitating MAES to support regional policy in Overseas Europe: mobilizing stakeholders and pooling resources (Grant agreement No 07.027735/2018/776517/SUB/ENV.D2) from April 2018 to September 2021, (see www.moveproject.eu)

Policy needs and gaps in Outermost Regions and Overseas
Increase awareness of the concept of ecosystem services
Mapping support
Ecosystem Services assessment
Decision-support approaches for better management of resources
Resources
Mapping tools
Ecosystem services valuation tools
Decision-supporting tools
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call