Abstract

The conventional reliability indices of a subtransmission system are generally based on probabilistic methods and include basic load point indices and system performance indices. In spite of the fact that these probabilistic indices are well established and their evaluation techniques are well developed, many power utilities are continuing to use deterministic methods to assess the reliabilities of their systems. The reluctance by a power system planner to accept probabilistic methods in their present form dictates a need to create a bridge between the deterministic methods and the existing probabilistic techniques. This can be achieved by using a well-being framework which links the existing deterministic criteria with a probabilistic method. This paper illustrates an extension of the conventional probabilistic approach utilized in the subtransmission system in the form of health and margin indices that provide system planners with measures of system well-being in addition to more conventional risk indices.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.