Abstract

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy compared with watchful waiting in Dutch children. Economic evaluation along with an open, randomized, controlled trial. Multicenter, including 21 general and 3 university hospitals in the Netherlands. Three hundred children aged 2 to 8 years were selected for adenotonsillectomy according to routine medical practice. Excluded were children who had frequent throat infections and those with suspected obstructive sleep apnea. Incremental cost-effectiveness in terms of costs per episode of fever, throat infection, and upper respiratory tract infection avoided. Annual costs incurred in the adenotonsillectomy group were euro803 (the average exchange rate for the US dollar in 2002 was $1.00 = euro1.1, except toward the end of 2002 when $0.95 = euro100) and euro551 in the watchful waiting group (46% increase). During a median follow-up of 22 months, surgery compared with watchful waiting reduced the number of episodes of fever and throat infections by 0.21 per person-year (95% confidence interval, -0.12 to 0.54 and 0.06 to 0.36, respectively) and upper respiratory tract infections by 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.97) episodes. The incremental costs per episode avoided were euro1136, euro1187, and euro465, respectively. In children undergoing adenotonsillectomy because of mild to moderate symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertrophy, surgery resulted in a significant increase in costs without realizing relevant clinical benefit. Subgroups of children in whom surgery would be cost-effective may be identified in further research. .

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.