Abstract

Background The diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease (IHD) frequently involves a functional assessment of ischaemia. Adenosine stress perfusion CMR is a non-invasive test with high sensitivity for the detection of IHD, however rarely is its accuracy for culprit vessel identification assessed. We sought to determine the accuracy of stress perfusion CMR for identifying the culprit vessel. Furthermore, we sought to affirm the specificity of a positive CMR against an angiographic gold standard. Methods Retrospective study of patients with a positive stress perfusion CMR and subsequent coronary angiography. Perfusion imaging was obtained at stress (adenosine 140 µg/kg/min) and rest on a 1.5T scanner. Late enhancement was assessed with dual pass gadolinium (0.2mmol/kg total dose). Angiographic stenosis ≥ 50% was defined as significant. The presence or absence of a significant lesion together with the correlation between ischaemic territory on CMR and angiographic culprit vessel was evaluated. Results Thirty seven patients (60% male, age 65.1 years ± 11.3; mean ± SD) had a positive CMR with subsequent angiography, with follow up data for a median 24 months (IQR 21-27 months). Thirtee np atients (35%) had previous myocardial infarction or revascularisation. Of the cohort of 37, six (16%) had normal angiograms and 31 (84%) had a significant epicardial stenosis. Of the six false positives, three had localised septal hypoperfusion, while a further three had circumferential defects. Of the 31 patients correctly identified, CMR accurately established the territory of the culprit vessel in 29 (94%). The vessels confirmed as ischaemic were left anterior descending 12 (39%), circumflex 6 (19%) and right coronary artery 13 (42%). Conclusions Adenosine stress perfusion CMR reliably identifies the territory supplied by the culprit vessel (29 out of 31 94%). Furthermore, we reaffirm the high specificity (84%) of stress perfusion CMR.

Highlights

  • The diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease (IHD) frequently involves a functional assessment of ischaemia

  • Adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a non-invasive test with high sensitivity for the detection of IHD, rarely is its accuracy for culprit vessel identification assessed

  • Of the cohort of 37, six (16%) had normal angiograms and 31 (84%) had a significant epicardial stenosis

Read more

Summary

Background

The diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease (IHD) frequently involves a functional assessment of ischaemia. Adenosine stress perfusion CMR is a non-invasive test with high sensitivity for the detection of IHD, rarely is its accuracy for culprit vessel identification assessed. We sought to determine the accuracy of stress perfusion CMR for identifying the culprit vessel. We sought to affirm the specificity of a positive CMR against an angiographic gold standard

Methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.