Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an intracoronary bolus injection of adenosine used in concert with ischemic preconditioning on postischemic functional recovery and infarct size reduction in the rabbit heart and to compare adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioning with ischemic preconditioning and magnesium-supplemented potassium cardioplegia. Methods: New Zealand White rabbits ( n = 36) were used for Langendorff perfusion. Control hearts were perfused at 37° C for 180 minutes; global ischemic hearts received 30 minutes of global ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion; magnesium-supplemented potassium cardioplegic hearts received cardioplegia 5 minutes before global ischemia; ischemic preconditioned hearts received 5 minutes of zero-flow global ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion before global ischemia; adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioned hearts received a bolus injection of adenosine just before the preconditioning. To separate the effects of adenosine from adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioning, a control group received a bolus injection of adenosine 10 minutes before global ischemia. Results: Infarct volume in global ischemic hearts was 32.9% ± 5.1% and 1.03% ± 0.3% in control hearts. The infarct volume decreased (10.23% ± 2.6% and 7.0% ± 1.6%, respectively; p < 0.001 versus global ischemia) in the ischemic preconditioned group and control group, but this did not enhance postischemic functional recovery. Magnesium-supplemented potassium cardioplegia and adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioning significantly decreased infarct volume (2.9% ± 0.8% and 2.8% ± 0.55%, respectively; p < 0.001 versus global ischemia, p = 0.02 versus ischemic preconditioning and p = 0.05 versus control group) and significantly enhanced postischemic functional recovery. Conclusions: Adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioning is superior to ischemic preconditioning and provides equal protection to that afforded by magnesium-supplemented potassium cardioplegia. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:154-62)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
