Abstract
Background and objectivesIn Schema Therapy (ST) for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) patients the empty chair technique (EC) is often used to diminish the ‘punitive parent mode’ (PP). The present study is a first attempt to assess whether EC is more effective in reducing the PP than a standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy technique (CT). MethodsWe utilized a counterbalanced, crossover design comparing one EC session to one CT session in twenty patients with a primary BPD diagnosis who had started ST. Before and after each intervention we assessed credibility, power, and valence of the PP-associated core belief and how much power patients felt over this core belief (dominance). Patients also completed a working alliance inventory. An interview was conducted to explore subjective views regarding the interventions. ResultsBoth techniques reduced power and credibility of the PP-associated core belief and increased dominance. CT reduced credibility more strongly than EC. Still, patients preferred EC as they felt it was better able to elicit feelings during the session and believed it would be more effective than CT when administered repeatedly. LimitationsA complex technique was tested early in treatment and only once, effects might be different later in treatment and when applied repeatedly. Moreover, only short-term effects were assessed in a rather small sample. ConclusionBoth EC and CT help combat the PP in BPD patients, with CT being more effective in reducing credibility after one session. However, patients preferred EC and suggest multiple sessions might be needed to truly elucidate differences between both techniques.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.