Abstract
In a landmark report in this issue of The Journal,2 David Bradshaw and his University of Utah colleagues show that their method for identifying pain grants in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) research portfolio, previously used to describe grants active in 2003,1 is sensitive enough to show statistically significant changes over a 4-year period. The bad news is that the trend is sharply down; in the period from 2004 to 2007, pain research fell from 0.78% to 0.61% of the NIH budget, which lost ground after adjustment for inflation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
