Addressing Race, Ethnicity, and Structural Inequality in Pharmacology Education and Assessment

Abstract

OBJECTIVESocial determinants of health, including race, ethnicity, and gender, represent important factors in health care delivery and patient outcomes, and contribute to health disparities. Pharmacology, as an integrated discipline, lies at the nexus between foundational science and clinical practice, providing a platform for educators to discuss the impact of social determinants on patient outcomes. Our goal is to create a framework that provides guidance for topics in pharmacotherapeutics for educators, learners, and providers to use in promoting antiracism in medical curricula.METHODSThrough iterative discussions, we developed a conceptual framework that includes topics taught across medical schools, such as drug metabolism, pharmacogenomics, adverse drug reactions, prescribing guidelines, factors affecting medication adherence, pain management, and therapeutic outcomes. Under each topic, we describe how social constructs such as race, ethnicity, and gender can impact pharmacology and therapeutic outcomes.RESULTSLiterature reports show that some topics in pharmacology education have already established cultural competency and should be adopted widely by all pharmacology educators, e.g., using more appropriate terminology for drug reactions such as vancomycin‐infusion reaction. Other topics are less established, so a more nuanced discussion with students is required. Society guidelines for managing diseases such as hypertension include prescribing recommendations based on race, with which learners are expected to be familiar as they enter clinical training but are actively being debated. Similarly, inter‐ethnic differences in drug metabolism are often reported as a function of genetic polymorphisms without considering non‐genetic factors.CONCLUSIONSWe have developed a conceptual framework for promoting antiracism in pharmacology education by categorizing topics based on those where cultural competencies are clearly established and those where a more nuanced discussion is required with learners, as well as identifying and reducing bias in assessment. These are generalizable across health professions in which pharmacology education is a discipline in the curriculum.