Abstract

The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) is a global standard for ecosystem risk assessment that integrates data and knowledge to document the relative risk status of ecosystem types as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), and vulnerable (VU). A series of indicators for each type gauge the probability of range wide “collapse”. Climate change vulnerability can factor into RLE assessments, especially as indicators of climate change severity under the criteria for environmental degradation over the recent and upcoming 50 years. We applied a new framework to assess climate change vulnerability—and thus, severity of climate change degradation—to a cross-section of 33 upland ecosystem types in the United States to demonstrate this input to the RLE. The framework addressed climate exposure and ecosystem resilience. Measures of climate change exposure used climate projections for the mid-21st century compared against a 20th century baseline. Augmenting measures in use for RLE assessment, measures of resilience included several for adaptive capacity, including topoclimate variability, diversity with functional species groups, and vulnerability of any keystone species. All 33 types were listed as VU (n = 22), EN (n = 9), or CR (n = 2) and 51% scored at least one step higher (e.g., LC up to VU) from climate change severity.

Highlights

  • Ecosystem-focused risk assessment is critical to conserving ecosystem patterns and processes, linking species to ecosystem functions, and characterizing trends in the overall condition of regional landscapes

  • The Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) framework identifies a series of criteria and indicators to apply range wide and assign each ecosystem type to red list categories of collapsed (CO), critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), vulnerable (VU), near threatened (NT), least concern (LC), data deficient (DD), or not evaluated (NE)

  • Among this cross-section of 33 types scored under the RLE, 2 types score as CR, 6 as 3.1.ERNL, E12RaessuVltUs,Parnidor1t3o aAspLpClicaantido/norofNCTri(tTeraibolne C3)2.bBoth Central and Northern Tallgrass

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecosystem-focused risk assessment is critical to conserving ecosystem patterns and processes, linking species to ecosystem functions, and characterizing trends in the overall condition of regional landscapes. This need led scientists to develop methods for assessing ecosystem risk that complement species risk assessment [1]. Ecosystem risk assessments document risk of changing species composition and ecological processes. The RLE framework identifies a series of criteria and indicators to apply range wide and assign each ecosystem type to red list categories of collapsed (CO), critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), vulnerable (VU), near threatened (NT), least concern (LC), data deficient (DD), or not evaluated (NE)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call