Abstract
Abstract Intra-cell travel is a difficult topic in zone-based travel demand models. In the past, different strategies were applied to approximate the average intra-cell distances by using zone size, diameter, distances to neighbors and other techniques. In this work we examine a new approach which uses address coordinates and a high performance routing program to achieve more accurate results. We apply our method to three different zoning schemes for the city of Berlin, Germany. The result consists of average travel distances for each zone based on all potential destinations. Surprisingly, the ratio of network distance and beeline distance is independent from the three different zoning schemes tested. This detour-factors depend only on the street network. For beeline distances larger than 400 m, we identify a simple transfer function between beeline and travel distance, which extends the classic transfer functions between different zones to intra-zone distances. We show that many distances below 100 m belong to a second class of intra-cell routes, which corresponds to the routing in a Manhattan-block grid. These two classes describe the intra-cell distances in our example quite well and we expect this approach to be helpful to examine other areas.
Highlights
The use of zone-based accessibility and impedance indicators is common practice in the analysis of spatial relationships, accessibility and demand modelling
We decided to examine the stability of this approach over different spatial zoning systems, to evaluate whether the zoning system affects the length distribution of routed trips
We show that it is possible to directly calculate the intra-cell travel times for all possible connections
Summary
The use of zone-based accessibility and impedance indicators is common practice in the analysis of spatial relationships, accessibility and demand modelling. Microscopic demand models often provide coordinate-based input data on the population or destinations, the usage of a zoning system and corresponding travel time matrices remains to be the standard procedure due to the high computational burdens associated with addressspecific routing. Natural barriers such as rivers or peninsulas and their man-made counterparts such as train tracks or one-way streets are examples of situations that might result in substantial deviations of the averaged routing results from the “real” travel time This is especially relevant for shorter distances and adjacent zones. We show that if explicit routing takes too long or is unavailable the trip length of short trips can be estimated well even when starting with the beeline distance only
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.