Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has become commonplace to iterate concepts and realize products in different industries. The maturation of AM has made it a viable alternative to Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) processes, nevertheless there remain several unexplored opportunities. One of these is profile plastic extrusion tooling, which is typically produced at low volumes, can be complex in geometry, and could benefit from AM’s bottom-up process. Such manufacturing options raise the question of how one can evaluate whether AM should be considered as opposed to SM. The objective of this work is to establish a technology assessment method to evaluate which extrusion profile cases warrant consideration for AM. Results from Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of polymer flow through the flow channel are related to several applied parameters used by the extrusion industry. This provides a means to evaluate a tool’s design virtually before implementing in production. The technology assessment is performed on a U-Channel case, which is a common open profile shape with several product variations in industry. Results from this work indicate that there is no advantage of pursuing AM over an SM informed design for the specific U-Channel case used in this study. In addition, streamlining features alone do not necessarily lead to clear improvements, highlighting the need for technology assessment tools and methods to evaluate whether AM or SM should be implemented. This work lays the foundation for evaluating which extrusion profile cases warrant consideration for an AM process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.