Abstract
Additive Manufacturing (AM) methods have become increasingly efficient and industrially viable in the past ten years. These methods offer the freedom of complexity to the designers and choices of localized and pull-based production system to the managers. These propositions of AM have been enabling custom manufacturing and are catalysts for rapid growth of additive manufacturing (AM). This paper analyzes the general characteristics of AM supply chain and proposes three AM supply chain models based on the specific nature of the industry. Our description of the models emphasizes on adopting an holistic view of the AM supply chain and therefore includes raw material, printer hardware and the virtual supply chain. Throughout the product life cycle of additively manufactured products, the interlacing of the virtual supply chain ( digital thread ) with the physical supply chain and their operations fundamentally make the AM process a cyber-physical system (CPS). Therefore, the technology brings along with it benefits of a CPS as well as a new class of attack vectors. We discuss the possible attacks (printer, raw material and design level), risks (reverse engineering, counterfeiting and theft) and provide an enhanced risk classification scheme. We contend that the traditional cybersecurity methods need to evolve to address the new class of attack vectors that threaten the AM supply chain and also discuss the nature of existing solutions that help in addressing the risks and attack threats. In providing an holistic view of the AM supply chain the interdependencies of the processes in the AM supply chain are presented and we elucidate the effects of local attack vectors on the entire supply chain. Further, we discuss the existing security measures to mitigate the risk and identify the existing gap in AM security that needs to be bridged.
Highlights
Additive manufacturing (AM) offers two unparalleled value propositions – customizability while maintaining potential profitability and freedom in design complexity
Any supply chain is vulnerable to attacks that can lead to intellectual property theft, sabotage, counterfeit production and other threats
A supply chain model is proposed in this work where the supply chain for AM is divided into three streams: raw materials, 3D printer, and design files and a detailed analysis of these streams is provided at the granular level
Summary
Additive manufacturing (AM) offers two unparalleled value propositions – customizability while maintaining potential profitability and freedom in design complexity. Industries have leveraged the proposition of this technology for catering to their niche requirements. The pharmaceutical manufacturing industry is capable of producing personalized drug dosage based on patient’s mass and metabolism [1]. Releasing the constraint of complexity in design is leveraged by the biotechnology industry to provide patients with anatomically specific prosthetics including bone implants [2], heart valves [3] and tracheal splints [4]. Electronics industries have leveraged upon both propositions in their production processes. With advancements in materials science, the users can enjoy the benefits of custom manufacturing, where the functionality of the product is not compromised due to the limitations of the fabrication method [5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
