Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the perioperative morbidity of PC-RPLND in two intermediate volume centers and to identify predictors of high morbidity.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 124 patients treated with open PC-RPLND at two tertiary referral centers between 2001 and 2018. Perioperative morbidity was determined by analyzing additional surgical procedures, intra-operative blood loss, and postoperative complications.ResultsAn additional procedure was necessary for 33 patients (26.6%). The risk was higher in patients with IGCCCG intermediate/poor prognosis (OR 3.56; 95% CI 1.33–9.52) and residual tumor size > 5 cm (OR 3.53; 95% CI 1.39–8.93). Blood loss was higher in patients with IGCCCG intermediate/poor prognosis (β = 0.177; p = 0.029), large residual tumor (β = 0.570; p < 0.001), an additional intervention (β = 0.342; p < 0.001) and teratoma on retroperitoneal histology (β = − 0.19; p = 0.014). Thirty-one patients had a postoperative complication Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 2 (25.0%). Complication risk was highest in patients undergoing an additional intervention (OR 3.46; 95% CI 1.03–11.60; p = 0.044).ConclusionsThe rate of additional interventions in our series is comparable to what has been reported in high-volume centers. IGCCCG intermediate/poor prognosis patients with high-volume disease and patients undergoing an additional surgical procedure can be classified as high-risk patients.

Highlights

  • Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) is an important component of the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumor (GCT) [1,2,3,4]

  • We evaluate the perioperative morbidity of PC-RPLND in two intermediate volume centers

  • Taking only the 107 patients with NSGCT into account, tumor size > 5 cm was still a significant predictor but intermediate/poor prognosis became borderline insignificant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) is an important component of the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumor (GCT) [1,2,3,4] It is a technically challenging procedure and is associated with significant treatment-related morbidity [5, 6]. Previous publications about the outcome of RPLND are mainly from high volume centers and these reports make the case for further centralization [10,11,12]. It is debatable whether these large series reflect the outcome of the procedure in general.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call