Abstract

BackgroundAdjuvant bisphosphonates are associated with improved breast cancer survival in postmenopausal patients. Addition of zoledronic acid (ZA) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve pathological complete response in the phase III NEOZOTAC trial. Here we report the results of the secondary endpoints, disease-free survival, (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Patients and methodsPatients with HER2-negative, stage II/III breast cancer were randomized to receive the standard 6 cycles of neoadjuvant TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy with or without 4 mg intravenous (IV) ZA administered within 24 h of chemotherapy. This was repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of ZA and covariates on DFS and OS. Regression models were used to examine the association between insulin, glucose, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, and IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) expression with survival outcomes.ResultsTwo hundred forty-six women were eligible for inclusion. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, OS for all patients was significantly worse for those who received ZA (HR 0.468, 95% CI 0.226–0.967, P = 0.040). DFS was not significantly different between the treatment arms (HR 0.656, 95% CI 0.371–1.160, P = 0.147). In a subgroup analysis of postmenopausal women, no significant difference in DFS or OS was found for those who received ZA compared with the control group (HR 0.464, 95% CI 0.176–1.222, P = 0.120; HR 0.539, 95% CI 0.228–1.273, P = 0.159, respectively). The subgroup analysis of premenopausal patients was not significantly different for DFS and OS ((HR 0.798, 95% CI 0.369–1.725, P = 0.565; HR 0.456, 95% CI 0.156–1.336, P = 0.152, respectively). Baseline IGF-1R expression was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. In a predefined additional study, lower serum levels of insulin were associated with improved DFS (HR 1.025, 95% CI 1.005–1.045, P = 0.014).ConclusionsOur results suggest that ZA in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a worse OS in breast cancer (both pre- and postmenopausal patients). However, in a subgroup analysis of postmenopausal patients, ZA treatment was not associated with DFS or OS. Also, DFS was not significantly different between both groups. IGF-1R expression in tumor tissue before and after neoadjuvant treatment did not predict survival.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01099436, April 2010.

Highlights

  • Bisphosphonates (BPs) act to suppress bone resorption by inducing osteoclast apoptosis [1, 2]

  • In a subgroup analysis of postmenopausal women, no significant difference in DFS or overall survival (OS) was found for those who received zoledronic acid (ZA) compared with the control group (HR 0.464, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) 0.176–1.222, P = 0.120; Hazard ratios (HRs) 0.539, 95% CI 0.228–1.273, P = 0.159, respectively)

  • In a predefined additional study, lower serum levels of insulin were associated with improved DFS (HR 1.025, 95% CI 1.005–1.045, P = 0.014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bisphosphonates (BPs) act to suppress bone resorption by inducing osteoclast apoptosis [1, 2]. Results of the meta-analysis of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) showed that adjuvant BPs were associated with decreased fracture rate, as well as improved breast cancer survival and bone metastasis risk. These benefits were only found in postmenopausal (natural or induced) women in a subgroup analysis [4]. Adding a BP to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients resulted in a significantly lower residual invasive tumor size and a non-significantly higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate in an exploratory evaluation of the AZURE trial [22]. We report the results of the secondary endpoints, disease-free survival, (DFS) and overall survival (OS)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call