Abstract

BackgroundMeasurement of folate monoglutamates by HPLC–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) in whole-blood lysate (WBL) requires lengthy incubation before analysis, risking degradation of labile folate vitamers. ObjectiveWe explored whether the addition of a commercially available recombinant exogenous γ-glutamyl hydrolase (exoGGH) enzyme reduced the required incubation time of WBL for measurement of folate as monoglutamates. MethodsFor conventional deglutamylation of polyglutamates, WBL was incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Alternatively, we added exoGGH to WBL at varying concentrations (1–10 µg/mL) and incubation times (0–90 min). We also investigated modifications to the sample diluent (pH, ascorbic acid compared with sodium ascorbate, and ascorbate concentration). Finally, we tested the effect of the enzyme in different sample types: WBL from frozen whole blood compared with frozen WBL or with frozen washed RBCs. Samples (n ≤ 15/experiment) were analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS for 6 folate monoglutamates and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate diglutamate. ResultsOptimal deconjugation of folate polyglutamates was achieved by using 1% ascorbic acid and 5 µg enzyme/mL WBL, requiring ≤30 min incubation time to achieve complete folate recovery as monoglutamates. This treatment resulted in similar folate concentrations as conventional deglutamylation (4 h at 37°C). The exoGGH enzyme was effective in samples stored frozen as whole blood and as WBL. However, the extended thaw time of whole blood resulted in 5-methyltetrahydrofolate loss and unacceptable changes to the non-methyl folate concentration. Total folate (with exoGGH) measured in washed RBCs was ∼15% lower than RBC folate calculated from WBL concentrations (conventional deglutamylation). ConclusionsThe use of exoGGH minimized incubation time and thus may avoid degradative losses of labile folate forms during sample preparation. The lower folate results in washed RBCs may be due to inadequate packing of RBCs, among other unidentified factors. A larger study is required to confirm the lack of differences in folate concentrations determined with and without the use of exoGGH.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.