Abstract
A total of 116 patients with small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either: cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2, and vincristine, 2 mg iv (Regimen A), or the same drugs plus etoposide, 100 mg/m2 iv daily for 2 days (Regimen B) every 3 weeks. Complete responders received whole-brain radiation therapy. The overall response rates were 50% for Regimen A and 65% for Regimen B (P less than 0.05). The complete response rates were 18% for Regimen A and 44% for Regimen B (P less than 0.01). For patients with limited disease, the complete responders were 35% on Regimen A and 52% on Regimen B (P = 0.26); for those with extensive disease, the complete responders were 0% on Regimen A and 35% on Regimen B (P = 0.002). The median survival for complete responders was 17 months on Regimen A and 20 months on Regimen B. The difference is not statistically significant. Toxicity was tolerable for both groups; however, it was greater for the etoposide arm. We conclude that although etoposide improves the overall response rates in patients with small cell lung cancer, especially those with extensive disease, the addition of this drug does not lead to improved survival.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.