Abstract
AbstractEcological Focus Areas (EFAs) are one of the three new greening measures of the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). We used an interdisciplinary and European‐scale approach to evaluate ecological effectiveness and farmers’ perception of the different EFA options. We assessed potential benefits of EFA options for biodiversity using a survey among 88 ecologists from 17 European countries. We further analyzed data on EFA uptake at the EU level and in eight EU Member States, and reviewed socio‐economic factors influencing farmers’ decisions. We then identified possible ways to improve EFAs. Ecologists scored field margins, buffer strips, fallow land, and landscape features as most beneficial whereas farmers mostly implemented “catch crops and green cover,” nitrogen‐fixing crops, and fallow land. Based on the expert inputs and a review of the factors influencing farmers’ decisions, we suggest that EFA implementation could be improved by (a) prioritizing EFA options that promote biodiversity (e.g., reducing the weight or even excluding ineffective options); (b) reducing administrative constraints; (c) setting stricter management requirements (e.g., limiting agrochemical use); and (d) offering further incentives for expanding options like landscape features and buffer strips. We finally propose further improvements at the next CAP reform, to improve ecological effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness.
Highlights
Agricultural intensification and land abandonment exert major pressures on farmland biodiversity and diminish ecosystem functions and services
Based on the expert inputs and a review of the factors influencing farmers’ decisions, we suggest that Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs) implementation could be improved by (a) prioritizing EFA options that promote biodiversity; (b) reducing administrative constraints; (c) setting stricter management requirements; and (d) offering further incentives for expanding options like landscape features and buffer strips
We focus here on Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs) because they represent a new element of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) whose effects on biodiversity are poorly documented
Summary
Agricultural intensification and land abandonment exert major pressures on farmland biodiversity and diminish ecosystem functions and services. The ongoing decline in biodiversity in and around farmland is a source of major concern both in Europe (EEA 2015) and globally (Maxwell et al 2016). In the European Union (EU), Conservation Letters, September/October 2017, 10(5), 517–530 Copyright and Photocopying: C 2016 The Authors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.