Abstract

This article is an addendum to Ref.~\cite{Baek:2014jga}. Here, we discuss the invisible Higgs decay width $\Gamma_{h}^{\rm inv}$ in the Higgs portal vector dark matter (VDM) model in the limit $m_V \rightarrow 0^+$. In the effective field theory (EFT) approach where the VDM mass is attributed to the St\"{u}ckelberg mechanism, $( \Gamma_{h}^{\rm inv} )_{\rm EFT}$ is divergent, which is unphysical and puzzling. On the other hand $( \Gamma_{h}^{\rm inv} )_{\rm UV}$ becomes finite in a UV completion, where the VDM mass is generated by the dark Higgs mechanism. Then we can take the limit $m_V \rightarrow 0^+$ by taking either {\it (i)} the dark gauge coupling $g_X \rightarrow 0^+$ with a fixed dark Higgs vacuum expectation value $v_\Phi$, or {\it (ii)} $v_\Phi \to 0^+$ with a fixed $g_X$. Such a difference in the behavior of $\Gamma_{h}^{\rm inv}$ in the massless VDM limit demonstrates another limitation of EFT for the Higgs portal VDM, and the importance of gauge-invariant and renormalizable models for the Higgs portal VDM.

Highlights

  • This article is an addendum to [S

  • In the effective field theory (EFT) approach where the vector dark matter (VDM) mass is attributed to the Stückelberg mechanism, ðΓihnvÞEFT is divergent, which is unphysical and puzzling

  • Some aspects of HP interactions in the EFT approach appear to be qualitatively different from those in UV-completions with gauge-invariance, unitarity, and renormalizability. These issues were discussed in detail in Refs. [2,3] for Higgs portal singlet fermion dark matter (HP SFDM), and Refs. [4–6] for HP VDM

Read more

Summary

INVISIBLE DECAY WIDTH OF THE HIGGS BOSON

Higgs portal (HP) interactions are simple and generic nongravitational channels for communication between the visible and the dark sectors. Some aspects of HP interactions in the EFT approach appear to be qualitatively different from those in UV-completions with gauge-invariance, unitarity, and renormalizability These issues were discussed in detail in Refs. In the massless VDM limit, the invisible Higgs decay width diverges in the EFT approach, whereas it remains finite in UV completions, as described below Such an appearance of a physically unacceptable observable indicates another limitation of the EFT approach, demanding care in the interpretation of the results of the EFT approach. In this addendum, we will demonstrate that this divergent catastrophe in the Higgs invisible decay width for the Higgs portal VDM in the EFT approach disappears in gauge-invariant renormalizable UV completions discussed in Refs. The aim of this addendum is to complete discussions on what happens to Γihnv when we take mV → 0þ limit

EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORY PREDICTION
RENORMALIZABLE AND GAUGE-INVARIANT THEORY
Unbroken Uð1Þ case with gXQΦ ≠ 0 and mV = 0
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call