Abstract

In this work, we critically review some aspects of our own article “A formulation of volumetric growth as a mechanical problem subjected to non-holonomic and rheonomic constraint” [Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, DOI: 10.1177/10812865231152228], which has been recently published in this journal. The reason for undertaking this critique is that, after exploring some fundamental literature, which was not included in our original paper, we have noticed that, if the “canonical doctrine” on non-holonomic and rheonomic constraints is followed, some of our conclusions should be partially rephrased, and the procedure adopted to obtain them can be shortened. In fact, some of the main results of our article, although remaining unaltered, can be retrieved in a more straightforward way, while some other results should be reconsidered, and some statements should be corrected. On the basis of these considerations, the scope of this work is to present the necessary amendments to our previous paper and to recast the core messages of our article, which remain valid, in an alternative form that is more concise and consistent with the standard theory of non-holonomic constraints.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call