Abstract

Adaptive waveform inversion (AWI) provides a means of performing full-waveform inversion (FWI) that appears to be immune to the effects of cycle skipping. However, the form of the AWI algorithm suggests that it could have increased sensitivity to errors in the assumed source wavelet, to noise in the field data, and to inadequacies in the physics used to simulate wave propagation. We examine each of these for a synthetic model. We show that AWI is in fact less sensitive than FWI to errors in the source wavelet, and is no more sensitive to errors in the data and in the modelling than is FWI. It appears likely that the immunity that AWI displays to cycle skipping also contributes to its reduced sensitivity to errors in the assumed source wavelet.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call