Abstract

The reduced basis methods (RBM) have been demonstrated as a promising numerical technique for statics problems and are extended to structural dynamic problems in this paper. Direct step-by-step integration and mode superposition are the most widely used methods in the field of the finite element analysis of structural dynamic response and solid mechanics. Herein these two methods are both transformed into reduced forms according to the proposed reduced basis methods. To generate a reduced surrogate model with small size, a greedy algorithm is suggested to construct sample set and reduced basis space adaptively in a prescribed training parameter space. For mode superposition method, the reduced basis space comprises the truncated eigenvectors from generalized eigenvalue problem associated with selected sample parameters. The reduced generalized eigenvalue problem is obtained by the projection of original generalized eigenvalue problem onto the reduced basis space. In the situation of direct integration, the solutions of the original increment formulation corresponding to the sample set are extracted to construct the reduced basis space. The reduced increment formulation is formed by the same method as mode superposition method. Numerical example is given in Section 5 to validate the efficiency of the presented reduced basis methods for structural dynamic problems.

Highlights

  • Nowadays structural dynamic problems are usually solved by the finite element technique

  • How to cite this paper: Huang, Y.H. and Huang, Y. (2015) Adaptive Reduced Basis Methods Applied to Structural Dynamic Analysis

  • As the reduced structural dynamic analysis performed by using mode superposition, the 12th truncation of mode is considered

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nowadays structural dynamic problems are usually solved by the finite element technique. (2015) Adaptive Reduced Basis Methods Applied to Structural Dynamic Analysis. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 5, 317-328. Huang placement responses of all the nodes requires great effort. The scale and complexity of dynamics problems of practical engineering structure are ever increasing such that it requests more memory and computing time than before. Despite of the continuing advances in computer speeds and hardware capabilities, the dimension for numerical simulation is too large to provide real-time response in the design, optimization, control and characterization of engineering components or systems. There are many motivations to develop methods that can reduce significantly the problem size and computational cost and retain the accuracy of the solution and the physics of the structures

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call