Abstract

AbstractThe present study was designed to determine the relative effectiveness of two control strategies: learner control (LC) vs. adaptive program control (PC), in computer aided learning (CAL). The LC strategy allowed learners to decide on the learning sequence of the four tasks and the number of practice examples to work on their own. The PC strategy allowed them to work on an easy to difficult task sequence with the number of examples prescribed. A set of four CAL tasks developed and used involved four conceptual rules of converting (a) mole to mole, (b) mole to mass, (c) mass to mole, and (d) mass to mass units in gravimetric stoichiometry. Thirteen LC and 13 PC grade 11 students worked on the four tasks. LC students attempted significantly more practice examples for longer time than PC students, but less successfully. The less than optimal learning performance seems to be most likely due to the undisciplined sequencing of the tasks. The general and specific self-rating intended as indexing learners’...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.